Nerd News:
Nerd News:
Top 11 Reasons to Secure & Protect Logs
Over on the LogBlog, our friend Anton Chuvakin has posted a piece about the top 11 reasons to secure and protect your logs. It’s a brilliant post: More after the jump:
1.Let's review why you are reviewing logs. Will logs that might have been changed by somebody, somewhere, somehow still be useful for items 1-11 from here? No? Secure them!
2.Logs in court? Challenges abound! To respond to them, one needs to protect the logs so you can claim that they are both authentic and reliable.
3.A human error still beats an evil hacker as the main cause of IT problems. Are your logs safe from it? Available when needed? Protect them from crashes and other faults!
4.PCI DSS just says so: "Secure audit trails so they cannot be altered." Want to do it- or pay the fines?
5.Do you protect financial records? Identity info? Passwords? Some of it ends up in logs (even if by mistake) - thus making them sensitive, protected information. Secure the C-I-A of logs!
6.Do you look at logs during incident investigation? Do you want them to be "true" or full of random (if creative...) "stuff", inserted by the guilty party? Secure the logs!
7.Think that "attacks vs logging" are theoretical? Think again. Are your logs safe or vulnerable? Is your logging tool 0wned?
8.Syslog + UDP = log injection + log loss. Are you protected (reliable TCP, confirmed delivery, encryption - SSH, SSL, VPN)?
9.Why modify logs? No, really, why change logs? If you never change logs - and you never should, unless it is appending to them - hash them right away after collection to make them immutable.
10.Logs are backed up on tape - who will see them? Well, whoever restores the tape, that's who! Encrypt them to protect them from accidental and malicious disclosure if tape is lost.
11.Why log access to logs? Same reason why you had the logs in the first place - to review who did what. Who broke through and stole the logs? Who browsed them without permission? Only logs will tell - if you have them!
Overall, one need to strive for having no holes in log safeguards from log birth to analyst conclusion based on log information...
Read more of the logblog here: And read more by Dr. Anton Chuvakin here:
Tuesday, November 6, 2007